Member Login
Home InfoCenter Salary Info Publications & Services Conferences & Events Membership Store Advertising Index

Users Guide to the Principles for Professional Conduct

Index to Ethics Guide

Principles for Employer Professionals

1.    Refraining from Improper Influence

“Employment professionals will refrain from any practice that improperly influences and affects job acceptances. Such practices may include undue time pressure for acceptance of employment offers and encouragement of revocation of another employment offer. Employment professionals will strive to communicate decisions to candidates within the agreed-upon time frame.”

(Intent / Rationale / Scenario / Resolution / Resources)

Intent

Students should be afforded the opportunity to make employment decisions that are based on a rational  evaluation of their needs and preferences.

Rationale

This principle calls on two of the three fundamental Principles precepts, namely an “open and free selection of employment opportunities” and “informed and responsible decision making by candidates.” It reflects a core value of the career services profession, noted in the Principles introduction as “helping students choose and attain personally rewarding careers.” While Principle One cautions against unduly influencing students by “imposing personal values or biases,” this employment principle takes a similar stance by proscribing actions that will interfere with a student’s right to conduct a free and clear appraisal of his or her needs while considering an offer.

Beneath this all is the respect for the human right of autonomy, i.e., being able to function independently of the control of others. Individuals whose autonomy is being respected by an employment professional will be provided with valid and complete information about the organization and position, and will be given a reasonable amount of time to make a decision about an offer. On the spot offers requiring quick decisions, signing bonuses that will be revoked quickly if the offer is not accepted within the tight timeline, and arbitrarily long delays in letting the student know about the outcome of an interview, violate the spirit of this principle.

Scenario

An organization employing interns makes an offer to an exceptional rising senior at the end of the summer. The offer is for a full-time position effective immediately following graduation. As the organization is desperate for students with this background, a generous signing bonus is included. However, the employer stipulates that the student must give an answer before the end of September, at which time the bonus and offer will be withdrawn.

Resolution

This sort of offer violates the Principles. The employer’s need and urgency are understandable. For the student, the appeal of not having to worry about job searching is considerable. However, this offer places unreasonable pressure on the student to relinquish the right to explore a full range of opportunities provided through the school’s recruiting program. And, from a practical standpoint, organizations that engage in this practice run the risk of bringing in employees who soon discover that their decisions were not sufficiently thought-out and that they could be much happier elsewhere. In this instance all parties lose.

Resources

Kaplan, Rochelle. "A Legal Look at Offers and Acceptances." Spotlight, May 3, 1999.

Kaplan, Rochelle. "Playing the Hiring Game: The Ethics of Offers and Acceptances." Journal of Career Planning & Employment, Winter 1998.

NACE Principles for Professional Conduct Committee. "Exploding Offers." Spotlight, October 15, 1999.

NACE Principles for Professional Conduct Committee. "Playing Fair." Job Choices 2002.


Principle 2. Knowledge of the field, industry, and
organization, possession of requisite skills

 

NACE is a proud founding member of International Network of Graduate Recruitment and Development Associations (INGRADA).
NACE is a founding member of International Network of Graduate Recruitment and Development Associations (INGRADA).